Originally posted 2018-03-07 23:55:40.
Nitrogen Narcosis – Perceptions of Susceptibility
Examining the human factors influencing diver perceptions of susceptibility to nitrogen narcosis.
By Andy Davis
Nitrogen narcosis is a hyperbaric neurological phenomenon. Its existence, symptoms and onset are known, even if medical science has not yet explained the physiological mechanisms causing it. Individual susceptibility to the effects of nitrogen narcosis varies in severity across individuals. It is also inconsistent in onset for a given individual on a given day.
It has been shown that the level of narcosis potential for a particular inert gas stems from its lipid solubility; the efficiency of a gas in diffusing into fatty tissues (i.e. the brain tissue) in the body. The most recent research is studying the effects of lipid-dissolved inert gasses on neurotransmitter receptor protein mechanism in the brain.
Variance in individual blood-brain chemistry and/or neurological make-up obviously play a role in nitrogen narcosis susceptibility. Nonetheless, it remains a known neurological occurrence that effects any diver subjected to an elevated partial pressure of inspired nitrogen.
Be under no illusions, narcosis effects humans as soon as inert-gas partial pressure begins to increase, from immediately below the surface and increasing in severity as depth/ partial pressures increases. We all get narc’d…and that starts a lot shallower than many divers are inclined to believe.
Perceptions of Susceptibility
The greatest variation between divers is the individual perception of susceptibility to narcosis. This is the person’s awareness of when, or if, they are suffering a decline in mental cognizance due to elevated nitrogen partial pressure.
One of the problems with gauging perception of susceptibility to narcosis is that of misleading education. Nitrogen narcosis doesn’t really conform to the classical “martini rule” that many instructors use as an analogy to describe the issue. The ‘martini rule’ is a baseless lay-theory which states that narcosis effects divers on a par with drinking a martini for each atmosphere (i.e. 10m/33ft depth) of pressure increase.
A weak or inaccurate analogy used by diving instructors to describe the symptoms of nitrogen narcosis causes divers to often fail in accurately diagnosing its onset. If divers don’t feel ‘drunk’, then they don’t perceive that nitrogen narcosis is affecting them.
Nitrogen narcosis isn’t a form of intoxication (drunkenness); it is actually an effect of anaesthesia. The word ‘narcosis’ originates from Greek word ‘narke’, meaning a “temporary decline or loss of senses and movement, numbness“. The currently accepted definition of narcosis is “a state of stupor, drowsiness, or unconsciousness“. At no point do those definitions indicate a propensity for giggling or donating your regulator to fishes…
The Placebo Effect
Narcosis and Autonomic Competency
Placebo effects aside… Narcosis is insidious because the very effect of reduced mental perception inhibits the diver from being aware of the decline in their intellectual capability. It’s difficult to gauge a decrease your IQ. In short, dumb people don’t understand they are dumb.
What matters, from a safety perspective, is whether the diver remains functional at a given depth; regardless of reduced mental performance (noticed or not). By ‘functional’, I mean retaining sufficient competency to apply the necessary skills and protocols needed to sustain diver safety given the parameters and relevant hazards of the dive undertaken.
There has been a substantial debate on whether certain divers develop an immunity to narcosis, or a capacity to operate effectively even when nitrogen narcosis is present. Neither of these theories reflects the neurological imperatives of how narcosis effects consciousness. I would suggest that the answer to differing performance levels under narcotic influence lies in what performance functions are affected, not which divers are affected.
I believe that retained functionality under the effects of nitrogen narcosis stems greatly from the degree to which diving skills, drills, protocols and procedures are ingrained to an autonomic (unconscious or involuntary) level. Reduced mental faculty impinges less on functions that are ingrained deeply as a second-nature to the diver.
Often, only when the diver observes impairment to autonomic capabilities do they perceive the impact of narcosis. The need to problem-solve, or the presentation of novel situations, brings a much more immediate perception of narcosis impairment. This, in principle, is a situation where the diver becomes aware that they should be able to achieve something but struggles to do so without obvious cause.
For a novice diver, with few ingrained second-nature capabilities, the perception of narcosis occurs quickly – at shallower depths. Mild narcosis exposes the fact that they are still problem-solving, rather than unconsciously performing, rudimentary diving functions.
As a diver gains experience and undergoes (effective) training, a wider spectrum of competencies are made second-nature and performed unconsciously. More skills are ingrained. More problems are encountered and overcome; becoming planned reactions rather than novel issues to be solved.
However, diving competencies fall into two categories; fundamental and specific. Fundamental competencies are things like buoyancy, trim, situational awareness and gas management. Specific competencies are those necessitated by the respective hazards of the dive environment and/or the tasks to be completed on the dive. Examples of these might be guideline procedures in cave diving or gas-switching procedures for decompression diving.
As such, diving competency must be considered relevant to the level of diving undertaken. An Advanced Open Water diver with weak foundational competencies can be just as narcosis compromised as a cave diver with weak specific competencies. Where the novice recreational diver might forget to check their air supply, the novice cave diver might deviate from proper guideline protocols. The same effect occurs, regardless of the level of skills compromised.
Routinely employed dive functions don’t expose narcosis impairment until that impairment reaches a very severe level, whereby the narcosis degrades actual autonomic dive functionality. In contrast, novel problems arising during the dive expose narcosis impairment more obviously.
Perceptions of narcosis impairment vary greatly. I believe that diver experience and competency play a major role in that perception.
The Impact of CO2 Retention.
An experienced, skilful, diver is more likely to manage their CO2 retention more effectively than a less experienced, less skilled, diver. This might play a large role in deciding the severity and perceived onset depth of nitrogen narcosis.
- Dive within the limits of your training and experience
- Respect your comfort zones
- Practice acquired skills diligently and routinely
- Minimize exertion and workload on dives
- Limit your depth until necessary dive competencies are ingrained
- The hazard of narcosis is relevant to the degradation of competencies necessary to preserve safety on a given dive.
- Fully understand the skill competencies necessary for the dives you undertake.
- Consider the degree to which you have ingrain those competencies into autonomic functions.
- Experience acquisition precludes the need for problem-solving.
- If you perceive any impairment to your expected diving competency, assume it is narcosis impairment.
- Abort and/or ascend if diving functionality is compromised by narcosis.
About the Author
Andy Davis is a RAID, PADI TecRec, ANDI, BSAC and SSI qualified independent technical diving instructor who specializes in teaching advanced sidemount, trimix and wreck exploration diving courses across South East Asia. Currently residing in ‘wreck diving heaven’ at Subic Bay, Philippines, he has amassed more than 9000 open circuit and CCR dives over 27 years of diving across the globe.
Andy has published many magazine articles on technical diving, has written course materials for dive training agency syllabus, tests and reviews diving gear for major manufacturers and consults with the Philippines Underwater Archaeology Society.
He is currently writing a series of books to be published on advanced diving topics. Prior to becoming a professional technical diving educator in 2006, Andy was a commissioned officer in the Royal Air Force and has served in Iraq, Afghanistan, Belize and Cyprus.